WPF General Assembly 2003
About  
What is a WPC/WSC?  
Types of Puzzles  
How to qualify  
Judging  
   
WPC  
2007: Rio de Janeiro  
2006: Borovets  
2005: Eger  
2004: Opatija  
2003: Arnhem  
2002: Oulu  
2001: Brno  
2000: Stamford  
1999: Budapest  
1998: Istanbul  
1997: Koprivnica  
1996: Utrecht  
1995: Poiana Brasov  
1994: Cologne  
1993: Brno  
1992: New York  
   
WSC  
2008: Goa  
2007: Prague  
2006: Lucca  
   
   

Related pages: Introduction | Organizing Committee | Program | Accommodations | Report | Individual Results | Team Results | WPF General Assembly | Survey | Team Photos

REPORT ON THE 5TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE WORLD PUZZLE FEDERATION
Arnhem, the Netherlands, October 16-17, 2003

by Will Shortz, USA


The meeting was called to order by chairman Will Shortz (USA) on October 16 at 14:20. Board members present were Peter Ritmeester, general secretary (Netherlands); Rob Geensen, treasurer (Netherlands); Erja Gullstén (Finland); and Will Shortz. Vitezslav Koudelka (Czech Republic) was absent.

The WPF member countries present were: Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary*, India, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Romania*, Russia*, Slovakia, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom*, and United States (* = nonvoting, pending payment of dues). A representative from nonmember country Canada was also present. Member country Argentina was absent. The meeting was held in three sessions over two days.

Will opened the meeting by welcoming the participants. The delegates introduced themselves and identified the organizations they represent.

The minutes of the 4th General Assembly of the WPF (Oulu, Finland), as printed in the World Puzzle Newsletter #8 (pages 16-19), were approved.

Will reminded those present that only WPF members who had paid the 2002-03 dues were permitted to vote at the meeting and to reprint the 2003 World Puzzle Championship puzzles at home.

Reports

a) Rob reported on the 2003 WPC, including extensive media coverage of the event.

b) Will reported that two new members, India and Peru, had been approved by the board for WPF membership -- although Peru had not yet paid the dues. Hendrik Hardeman (India) spoke about his goal to increase interest in WPC-style puzzles in India.

c) Rob handed out a report on the WPF finances. For the period from July 1, 2002, to June 30, 2003, the WPF had receipts of 8,783.20 euros and expenses of 3,968.37 euros, leaving a balance on June 30 of 10,108.16 euros.

For the period from July 1 to October 10, 2003, the WPF had receipts of 11,463.35 euros and expenses of 5,759.47 euros, leaving a current balance of 15,812.04 euros.

Rob mentioned that the design and printing costs of WPF Newsletter #8 were not yet shown on the expense report.

Peter said he will talk with Ján Farkas (Slovakia) about printing the next newsletter in Slovakia in order to reduce its cost.

d) Will asked for puzzle-related articles and other contributions for the next newsletter. The deadline was set as December 15, although material at any time would be welcome. Articles do not need to be in polished English; they will be copyedited by an English speaker and, upon request, returned to the author for approval.


Promotion and Sponsorship

a) On behalf of the board, Will reported that Google, the Internet search company, which sponsors the U.S. team at the WPC, had also expressed interest in sponsoring the WPC itself. The board will pursue discussions with Google and other potential sponsors. Any sponsorship agreement that is made will be binding on WPC hosts from 2005 onward.

Will said the board will decide in general terms how any sponsorship money is to be spent. The primary goal will be to increase WPC participation by subsidizing the travel and attendance expenses of competitors from less wealthy countries.

Meanwhile, the board will also facilitate discussions for 2004 WPC sponsorship between Google and organizer Valter Kvalic (Croatia).

b) On behalf of the board, Will reported that the New York Times Syndicate had expressed interest in syndicating a weekly feature of WPC-style puzzles to newspapers around the world, with the WPF's endorsement. This could result in publicity and a modest amount of money for the WPF. Any developments will be reported on the WPF website.

c) In the absence of Vitezslav Koudelka, it was not known how much progress he had made during the past year on producing a brochure to promote the WPC/WPF. Stanley Newman (USA) offered to help him. Peter said he would check with Vitezslav.

Hendrik suggested that the WPF produce a CD-ROM rather than a brochure.

d) Valter said he would make strong efforts to attract countries near Croatia that are not present at this year's WPC to attend next year's.

Helene Hovanec (USA) offered to help write to other countries. She will work with Valter to do this.


Puzzlers' Survey

Peter handed out a report on the results of a survey of 2002 WPC competitors on what they liked and didn't like about the WPC. It is summarized in WPF Newsletter #8 (pages 22-23). The full report will be posted on the WPF website.

Peter said he would do a new survey on the 2003 WPC. Bettina Rothaermel (Germany) offered to help him compile the results.

WPC Puzzle Guidelines

Peter handed out a reprint of the "Puzzle Guidelines for the World Puzzle Championship" and an article on "What Is Fair?," as they appeared in the WPF Newsletter #2 (1997, pages 14-15).

This sparked a discussion on the guideline that "general knowledge" puzzles can account for up to 10% of WPC scoring; also that "geographical questions ... are proper subjects for the competition" and that other "tests of knowledge" are acceptable, "if ... used with ... caution."

Based on comments from past competitors, the board made a motion that "Puzzles testing general knowledge are not allowed in the WPC."

Valter said that if a WPC round contains more puzzles than any solver can do, then having a small percentage of the puzzles test geographical knowledge, for example, should not be a problem.

Peter said that including such puzzles is still inherently unfair, because it limits the options of the solvers who lack the relevant knowledge. He said the WPC should be a test of solving skills, not knowledge.

John Wetmiller (Canada) said he would like the WPC puzzles to be as inclusive as possible.

Nevzat Erkmen (Turkey) said the WPC's puzzles should embrace as much of life as possible.

Hendrik said he would like the WPC to include types of puzzles not on the approved list -- not necessarily for points, but rather for fun and/or experimentation.

After all discussion, the motion passed 8-2.

The board also moved that "Puzzles that reward knowledge of English or any other language represented at the WPC are not allowed." Thus, crisscross and word search puzzles used in the WPC would have to be in a neutral language, and if a logical puzzle has a final answer that spells a word, that word should not be in English or another non-neutral language. This passed 10-0.

Will pointed out that the rules still allow puzzles to use the Roman alphabet, with which it is assumed all competitors are familiar. Also, the puzzle instructions are to be in English, which is the official language of the WPC.

Hendrik said he would like a catalog of all past WPC puzzles in order to help new competitors. For example, not everyone is necessarily familiar with Battleships or other puzzles frequently used in the WPC.

Serhiy Grabarchuk (Ukraine) said that in the list of puzzle guidelines, the category "mechanical puzzles" would be better worded as "manipulative puzzles." Will agreed. Nick Baxter (USA) suggested that this change in wording be made in the next printing.

Will mentioned that, following the WPF rules, the board will name a neutral person or panel of persons to review the 2004 WPC puzzles and rules before the championship for adherence to the standards of fairness.

Crossword Puzzles

On behalf of the board, Will asked for volunteers to form a committee on ways to incorporate crossword puzzles in the WPF's activities -- not in the main competition, but as separate events or in the newsletter. He said the goal would be to make the WPF more useful and relevant to members.

The volunteers were Hendrik (India), Valter (Croatia), Nevzat (Turkey), György Istvan (Hungary), and Tim Preston (United Kingdom).

When ready, their proposals will be posted on the WPF website for discussion.


Membership Fee for 2004-05

On behalf of the board, Rob proposed that the WPF membership fee for 2004-05 be 250 euros. As in the past, members from wealthier countries are encouraged to pay more. However, there will be no exceptions made with a lowered amount.

The motion passed 10-0.


Site Selection for the 2005 WPC

Peter reported he had received two offers to host the 2005 WPC (from Bulgaria and India) by the deadline for offers before this year's WPC. As Hungary had subsequently expressed an interest, though, a motion was made to open the discussion to other offers. This passed 10-0.

Three offers were made. Each presenter was given five minutes to provide details.

György renewed his offer from last year to host the 2005 WPC in Miskolc, Hungary's third-largest city, located in the northeast of the country, at the same hotel where a recent World Chess Championship was held. The event would include a crossword tournament in the evening, open to all WPC participants, including captains and guests. Hungary's 6th annual 24-Hour Puzzle Championship would be held immediately before or after the WPC, and would be open to all WPC participants for a modest extra fee.

Iliana Zvetkova (Bulgaria) offered to host the 2005 WPC in Borovec, Bulgaria, a mountain resort about 60 kilometers south-southeast of Sofia. It would be organized by Bulgarian Mensa, with the help of puzzlers at the University of Sofia.

Hendrik offered to host the 2005 WPC in Kochi, in southern India, on the coast of the Arabian Sea. The championship would be held at a four-star hotel. The puzzles would be created by puzzlers from India as well as other countries that haven't yet hosted a WPC. He would try to get participation from countries throughout Asia (including China), the Persian Gulf states, and Australia.

After questions and discussion, a vote was conducted by secret ballot. The results: Hungary -- 5, Bulgaria -- 4, India -- 2.


Election of a Board Member

One person, Hüsnü Sincar (Turkey), had been nominated by the deadline to fill the board position being vacated by Erja. He spoke about himself and his goal to make the WPC better known. He was elected 8-1.

Erja was applauded for her service on the board for the past three years.

Will reminded members that two board positions will be electable in 2004. A person may nominate himself or someone else.


Statement from the 2004 WPC Organizers

Valter Kvalic announced plans for next year's WPC, to be held October 12-17 at the Hotel Ambassador, in Opatija, a resort town in Croatia, on the Adriatic Sea. It will be sponsored by Feniks magazine. Attendees will be provided round-trip transportation to the hotel from either the Zagreb airport or the train station in Rijeka. Other nearby major airports are Trieste and Venice, Italy. The price will be no higher than in 2003.


News

Nick reported on the recent world Rubik's games championships and suggested that their organization might be a worthwhile contact for the WPF in the future.


Closing

On behalf of the WPF, Will thanked Rob and his colleagues for an exceptionally fine WPC -- in its site, puzzles, organization, time provided for socializing and playing games, and the innovation of providing the instruction booklet a week before the event. Members enthusiastically concurred.

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned on October 17 at 14:45.

 
Related pages: Introduction | Organizing Committee | Program | Accommodations | Report | Individual Results | Team Results | WPF General Assembly | Survey | Team Photos

 

Page updated on Monday, 21 August 2006

Copyright © 2001 World Puzzle Federation
http://www.worldpuzzle.org/